Re: Do you think Bad Company 2 is better?

by Donkey on Wed Feb 10, 2010 7:13 pm

MW2, BC2 is a cheap ripoff with a campaign worse than.... anything Very Happy

by BiteTheDust on Thu Feb 11, 2010 3:13 am

Donkey wrote:MW2, BC2 is a cheap ripoff with a campaign worse than.... anything

The game didn't come out yet, so shut up about the campaign. And how is BC2 a rip-off? 'Cause of sprinting and knifing? There was a game out there (forgot the name) that had both that come out before CoD.

by Donkey on Thu Feb 11, 2010 4:08 am

The whole feeling of the game is a direct copy, loads of features are copied - too many to name. And all other campaigns in the series were crap so I can only presume.

by **BronzeRevolution** on Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:26 am

I've tried the MP demo on 360. It's decent, but not up to scratch. They seriously need to fix it up in places, but the gunfire and movement feels more real and sensitive than MW2.

I'm gonna get the official version, but I think I'll prefer MW2.

by BiteTheDust on Fri Feb 12, 2010 4:48 am

Donkey wrote:The whole feeling of the game is a direct copy, loads of features are copied - too many to name. And all other campaigns in the series were crap so I can only presume.

The whole feeling of MW2 is the same as Perfect Dark 64 or Golden Eye. The only features that were "copied" were the sprinting which was in the first and knifing which was also in the first. They also give you binoculars, which MW2 doesn't have, vehicles that you can DRIVE, Much more sniper rifles, not-so-crappy C4, The ability to revive you're teammates in a different way, give supplies to you're teammates, able to plant a mine, LMG's are actually fun for a change, and much much much much much much much much much more.

by Tricky on Fri Feb 12, 2010 4:59 am

BiteTheDust wrote:
Donkey wrote:The whole feeling of the game is a direct copy, loads of features are copied - too many to name. And all other campaigns in the series were crap so I can only presume.

The whole feeling of MW2 is the same as Perfect Dark 64 or Golden Eye. The only features that were "copied" were the sprinting which was in the first and knifing which was also in the first. They also give you binoculars, which MW2 doesn't have, vehicles that you can DRIVE, Much more sniper rifles, not-so-crappy C4, The ability to revive you're teammates in a different way, give supplies to you're teammates, able to plant a mine, LMG's are actually fun for a change, and much much much much much much much much much more.

...but a crappy internal system. If MW2 had some of those things, then it would be obviously better than BC. Driving vehicles has always seemed to be a part of Battlefield... that and huge maps. If MW2 had huge maps, with the current set-up, then it would be completely full of campers. Something I noticed in Battlefield too is that a lot of the land is just empty space so that they can have big maps.

by **BronzeRevolution** on Fri Feb 12, 2010 5:14 am

DarkBoom wrote:
BiteTheDust wrote:
Donkey wrote:The whole feeling of the game is a direct copy, loads of features are copied - too many to name. And all other campaigns in the series were crap so I can only presume.

The whole feeling of MW2 is the same as Perfect Dark 64 or Golden Eye. The only features that were "copied" were the sprinting which was in the first and knifing which was also in the first. They also give you binoculars, which MW2 doesn't have, vehicles that you can DRIVE, Much more sniper rifles, not-so-crappy C4, The ability to revive you're teammates in a different way, give supplies to you're teammates, able to plant a mine, LMG's are actually fun for a change, and much much much much much much much much much more.

...but a crappy internal system. If MW2 had some of those things, then it would be obviously better than BC. Driving vehicles has always seemed to be a part of Battlefield... that and huge maps. If MW2 had huge maps, with the current set-up, then it would be completely full of campers. Something I noticed in Battlefield too is that a lot of the land is just empty space so that they can have big maps.

Yeah. I'm glad MW2 doesn't have some of BC2's features, because it makes it unique. Both are very different.

by Donkey on Fri Feb 12, 2010 9:20 am

BiteTheDust wrote:
Donkey wrote:The whole feeling of the game is a direct copy, loads of features are copied - too many to name. And all other campaigns in the series were crap so I can only presume.

The whole feeling of MW2 is the same as Perfect Dark 64 or Golden Eye. The only features that were "copied" were the sprinting which was in the first and knifing which was also in the first. They also give you binoculars, which MW2 doesn't have, vehicles that you can DRIVE, Much more sniper rifles, not-so-crappy C4, The ability to revive you're teammates in a different way, give supplies to you're teammates, able to plant a mine, LMG's are actually fun for a change, and much much much much much much much much much more.

Yup, but also note how sprinting and knifing was in the original MW, which was released before the first Bad Company. MW2 doesn't have vehicles because it's not the same kind of game. That's like saying Burnout Paradise is better than Halo because it has racing cars.

Take your head out of your a*se and realize I was giving an opinion, there's no need to shout at me every time. I'm only reacting like this because I post something and you instantly tell me to shut up.

Oh, and finally, this thread is stupid anyway - BC2 hasn't even been released yet. Who knows, maybe the final code will be better than MW2.

by BiteTheDust on Fri Feb 12, 2010 12:13 pm

Donkey wrote:
BiteTheDust wrote:
Donkey wrote:The whole feeling of the game is a direct copy, loads of features are copied - too many to name. And all other campaigns in the series were crap so I can only presume.

The whole feeling of MW2 is the same as Perfect Dark 64 or Golden Eye. The only features that were "copied" were the sprinting which was in the first and knifing which was also in the first. They also give you binoculars, which MW2 doesn't have, vehicles that you can DRIVE, Much more sniper rifles, not-so-crappy C4, The ability to revive you're teammates in a different way, give supplies to you're teammates, able to plant a mine, LMG's are actually fun for a change, and much much much much much much much much much more.

Yup, but also note how sprinting and knifing was in the original MW, which was released before the first Bad Company. MW2 doesn't have vehicles because it's not the same kind of game. That's like saying Burnout Paradise is better than Halo because it has racing cars.

Take your head out of your a*se and realize I was giving an opinion, there's no need to shout at me every time. I'm only reacting like this because I post something and you instantly tell me to shut up.

Oh, and finally, this thread is stupid anyway - BC2 hasn't even been released yet. Who knows, maybe the final code will be better than MW2.

Okay, you know best smart-a*se.

by RR on Sun Feb 14, 2010 3:22 pm

BF:BC2- so much better. I was in the beta in December, and it was flippin amazing. Im playing the demo a lot now, but I liked the beta better since you can actually rank up easily past Rank2. You could also basically get all the guns in the beta..but both of the maps theyve shown are amazing.

Which is better?